Publications
Publication Information
| Title | Collinear Factorization at sub-asymptotic kinematics and validation in a diquark spectator model |
| Authors | Juan Guerrero, Alberto Accardi |
| JLAB number | JLAB-THY-20-3254 |
| LANL number | arXiv:2010.07339 |
| Other number | DOE/OR/23177-5043 |
| Document Type(s) | (Journal Article) |
| Associated with EIC: | No |
| Supported by Jefferson Lab LDRD Funding: | No |
| Funding Source: | Nuclear Physics (NP) |
|
Journal Compiled for Physical Review D Volume 106 Page(s) 114016 Refereed | |
| Publication Abstract: | We revisit the derivation of collinear factorization for Deep Inelastic Scattering at sub-asymptotic values of the four momentum transfer squared, where the masses of the particles participating in the interaction cannot be neglected. By using an inclusive jet function to describe the scattered quark final state, we can restrict the needed parton kinematic approximations just to the overall four-momentum conservation of the hard scattering process, and explicitly expand the rest of the diagram in powers of the unobserved parton transverse momenta rather than neglecting those. This procedure provides one with more flexibility in fixing the virtuality of the scattered and recoiling partons, and naturally leads to scaling variables that more faithfully represent the partonic kinematic at sub-asymptotic energy than Bjorken's xB variable. We verify the validity of the obtained factorization formula by considering a diquark spectator model designed to reproduce the main features of electron-proton scattering at large xB in Quantum Chromo-Dynamics, where the Deep Inelastic Scattering contribution to the cross section can be explicitly isolated and analytically calculated. Limiting ourselves to the leading twist contribution, we show that use of the new scaling variables maximizes the kinematic range of validity of collinear factorization, and highlight the intrinsic limitations of this approach due to the approximate treatment of four momentum conservation in factorized diagrams. Finally, we briefly discuss how these limitations may be overcome by including higher-twist corrections to the factorized calculation. |
| Experiment Numbers: | other |
| Group: | THEORY CENTER |
| Document: | |
| DOI: | https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.106.114016 |
| Accepted Manuscript: | PhysRevD.106.114016.pdf |
| Supporting Documents: | |
| Supporting Datasets: | |